An appeasement too far
The abilities of the aggressive supremacists and exceptionalists of Islam unfortunately been advanced by an appalling, appeasing decision from a Judge. Thowing aside completely that idea that justice should be seen as well as done, a Judge has capitulated to Shariab Law by basically saying that the Islamic full face veil, that uniform of fascistic totalitarian Islam, can be worn in a British court.
Sky news reports:
“A Muslim woman will be allowed to stand trial wearing a full-face veil – but must remove it while giving evidence, a judge has ruled.
Lawyers for the woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, had argued it would breach her human rights and be counter to Britain’s tolerance of Islamic dress to remove her niqab against her wishes.”
So would it be equally ok for some fraggle to dress up as one of Oswald Mosley’s mob, because with Islam that is about the level of authoritarian ideology we are dealing with here. Much Islamic dress, especially that which is culturally inappropriate for the UK, in that it covers the face, is not for modesty, it is to intimidate. Niqabs, burkhas and all the other face obscuring clothing that the savages of Islam often like to force their women to wear are a giant ‘f**k off’, to all of us. These garments say, we are not like you, they are garments of exterme separation. They have an air of menace which has no place in British society. We quite rightly ban political groups marching round in uniforms, which must make us ask the question; ‘what do the savages have that the Mosleyites and other lunatics do not have?’ The answer is they have the ears of that compliant appeasing Establishment, created by Labour councils and Labour governments and unfortunately continued by what is left of he Conservative party.
The Sky piece continued:
“But Judge Peter Murphy, sitting at London’s Blackfriars Crown Court, said: “In general, the defendant is free to wear the niqab during trial.
“If the defendant gives evidence she must remove the niqab throughout her evidence. The court may use its inherent powers to do what it can to alleviate any discomfort, for example by allowing the use of screens or allowing her to give evidence by live link.”
Look on how Judge Murphy has pandered to this savage. A woman who is to be on trial for serious offences, is given the sort of protection by the court, with video links and other stuff to ‘allieviate her discomfort’, that would be given to a witness in a child abuse case. It is utterly disgusting to see such a terrible judgement which has set a worrying precedent for the sort of two tier justice systems that we see anywhere that Islam gains the upper hand. Yet again the honest and reasonable people, who follow all gods or none, are being treated differently to this unwanted ideology and those who follow its precepts.
The Sky piece added:
“The issue of whether women should be forced to remove their veil in public has been subject to recent political discussion.
Home Office Minister Jeremy Browne has called for a national debate on whether the state should step in to prevent young women having the veil imposed upon them.
Mr Browne’s intervention came after a row erupted over the decision by Birmingham Metropolitan College to drop a ban on the wearing of full-face veils amid public protests.
The minister said he was “instinctively uneasy” about restricting religious freedoms, but said there may be a case to act to protect girls who were too young to decide for themselves whether they wished to wear the veil or not.”
The presence of Islamic hate-garb for that is what it is, is more than an intellectual discsussion only within political circles it is for all of us to debate. This really is a question of ‘who governs Britan’, is it the people via Parliament or is it a combination of the savages their useful idiot allies and thoroughly debased and overextended human rights law. It is a historical irony that would make a person die with laughter if it was not that they died of shame first, to see a human rights convention, designed to protect people from oppressors and oppression, being used to protect those who oppression of others is visible for all the world to see. If it is illegal to parade up and down in an SS uniform, or a Blackshirt, why should not Islamic hate-wear such as the niqab and he burkha be treated the same?
Judge Murphy has made his judgement in this case, but I belive that there will be many people who will not only disagree with it but who will look at this decision and wail at the sheer treason to the concept of open justice and that this precedent setting case, is truly an appeasement too far.