Owing to problems with an intermittent server outage with the main Fahrenheit 211 site this wordpress hosted blog has been temporarily updated with all posts from the http://www.fahrenheit211.net site.
This wordpress hosted site doesn’t have many of the same features as the .net site and my apologies for this outage. Maybe Max Mosley should send some of his professional friends to spank soundly the server techs across the pond.
http://www.fahrenheit211.net is now up and running but it is likely that there may be some outages to service.
The decimation and destruction that Nigerian Jihadists have brought to that country’s Christian community appears to get worse by the day. Whether it be random churches raked with gunfire or teachers of secular or non-Muslim subjects murdered, the attacks by Islamic groups like Boko Haram, the situation in Nigeria shows the inherant lack of tolerance and respect for others by yet more followers of Islamic ideology.
The scale of the problem facing Nigerian Christians is immense. The UPI news agency reported that a majority of the Catholic churches in one diocese alone had been alleged to have been destroyed. Quoting a priest from the Nigerian Catholic Church UPI said:
“The Rev. Jerome Ituah of Christ the King Catholic Parish in Kurudu, a populated area of the Abuja Capital Territory, made the accusation Saturday, saying he witnessed the destruction, Leadership Newspapers reported.
“Out of the 52 Catholic churches in Maiduguri diocese, 50 of them have been destroyed by Boko Haram. Yet the faithful are not discouraged of their faith. You would always see them worshiping under rain and sun in open places at the site of their destroyed places of worship,” Ituah said.
Ituah, who was in Maiduguri to lead a retreat with priests and the bishop of the diocese there, called on Catholics in Kurudu to pray for their counterparts in Maiduguri and elsewhere in northern Nigeria.”
50 out of 52 churches in one diocese is an appalling number and shows the ferocity of hatred that the Islamic groups in Nigeria have for Christians and other non-Muslims. Of course Christians should pray for their co-religionists and it is admirable how Christians are resisting in the ways they are, but Nigerian Christians need more than prayer, more than self-confidence and resiliance, they need action, preferably military.
The Nigerian Government (and others nations both within and outside Africa who are in a position to do so) should make a concerted effort to push back, with ‘extreme prejudice’ against the likes of Boko Haram, similar groups and those who aid and abet them.
Sometimes an enemy, like Boko Haram or worse, is so bad, so violent, so aggressive that, when faced with it, as Britain found in the recent past, that there is no alternative to Governments having to start fighting back, even if it causes bloodshed, because to not fight back invites genocide, oppression and enslavement. The Nigerian Government, with help, needs to do more to counter Islamic aggression in its part of Africa.
Also, we in the West need to get OUR governments to fight back against Islamic barbarism before the significant minority (see survey note below) of Europe’s Islamic community, who support the aggressive aspects of Islamic ideology, are allowed to become any more violent and numerous than they already are.
As Nigerian Christian are finding, looking the other way, turning the other cheek and appeasement where Islam is concerned, is bringing nothing but death and destruction.
Original story from UPI agency
Boko Haram certainly don’t look like they are going to ‘renounce violence’ which was part of a deal offered by the Nigerian Government to Boko Haram for an amnesty. An amnesty would be a terrible idea and would only be seen as a sign of weakness by Boko Haram. Groups like Boko Haram do not need appeasment, only complete destruction by a military counter attack. See link below for details of offered amnesty.
Islamic attitudes survey carried out by amongst others respectable pollsters such as Pew Global (thanks to Jamie Black over at The Commentator for putting this list together0
World Events and Conspiracy Theories:
29% believe the Holocaust occurred
45% thought 9/11 was a conspiracy between the USA and Israel
17% believe 9/11 was carried out by an Arab
Freedom of Speech:
78% thought that the publishers of the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed should be prosecuted
68% thought those who insulted Islam should be prosecuted
62% of people disagree that freedom of speech should be allowed even if it insults and offends religious groups
Sympathy to Terrorism, Terrorists and Hate Preachers:
22% disagree that religious leaders supporting terrorism should be removed
19% say they respect Osama Bin Laden
Just over half thought the conviction of the cleric Abu Hamza for incitement to murder and race hatred was fair
24% believe violence against civilian targets to defend Islam can be justified in some cases
Imagine if your educational experience at school involved a large amount of the following: being taught to disparage members of other religions, being taught that no member of these other religons had achieved anything and being lied to about the number of members of other religions present when your country was created.
Sounds hellish doesn’t it, now where could that be, could it be Britain, nope, could it be France, nope or could it be the leftwingers favourite target hate target, Israel, no not there either.
Oh well it’s Pakistan, you might have guessed. Even if this wasn’t alluded to in the title, many people would guess that the educational shithole that is being referred to was Pakistan.
The Pakistan Tribune reports that a meeting of Pakistani intellectuals found appalling biases in the text books used in Pakistani schools and colleges, along with enforced Islamic religious education even for those of minority faiths. Pakistani Children were according to one participant, Karamat Ali, were being fed ‘horrifying myths about people of other faiths’
The curriculum appears to include outright lies by omission and commission such as not saying that Pakistans first Chief Justice was a Christian and that at the time of Indian sub-continental partition there were more Hindus living in the area that is now Pakistan than there actually were.
The Pakistan Tribune said that on top of the twisted curriculum materials there was also pressure put on students to convert to Islam:
“I have heard of cases where Muslim students ask non-Muslim high achievers: Why don’t you convert to our religion,” recalled Karamat Ali, the executive director of the Pakistan Institute of Labour Education and Research. “And it is not just Muslims and Hindus, but also Shias who are given this treatment. This is because of the horrifying myths about people of other faiths that we fill our children with.”
Ali criticised political parties for having a narrow vision. “Every party says that they’ll bring ‘roti, kapra and makaan’. What about the freedom to practice your religion?”
Hmm! Freedom of religion not really an Islamic concept is it?
The Tribune article continued:
Dr Bernadette Dean, the principal of St Joseph’s College for Women, spoke about the religious and gender biases found in text books in Pakistan. “In the curriculum, Islamiat was included in the ‘general knowledge’ taught to children and was made compulsory for students in classes one, two and three,” she pointed out.
“This goes against Article 22 of the Constitution, which states that no person will be forced to attain religious education.”
Dean found religious biases in textbooks written for English, Urdu, Pakistan studies and social studies. “Teachers have to teach these textbooks because students are tested on them in the examinations. They don’t have the choice of breaking out of the system,” she said, adding that the cherry on top is the system of rote learning.
“Imagine thousands of students all over Pakistan rote learning biases against people of other religions by heart and then regurgitating them.” “
That isn’t an education system it is indoctrination of hate. What is going on in Pakistan’s education system regarding the demonisation of Pakistanis who follow a minority faith is appalling, and if it was done to Muslims anywhere in a non Muslim country you can bet your life that something would be done about it. The Pakistani education system appears to be extremely Islamicly supremecist, and sounds like a pretty dangerous and unpleasant place for Pakistani Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, and Ismaili and Shia Muslims.
It also seems that Pakistani ‘education’ ignores women and when women are mentioned in the curriculum they are in traditional home making and child rearing roles. On top of that any question of Islamic or Pakistani blame for the appalling violence at the time of partition in 1947, is ignored or Pakistanis are made to seem as absolute victims. The Tribune added:
“The partition is a tricky topic. “When I asked my students to write about the problems faced by Pakistan during partition, they said: Hindus are bad because they didn’t want to give us the Rs200 million promised to us at partition,” she said.
She then spoke about how textbooks fail to represent gender in a fair manner. “Our text books are full of great men,” she explained.
“You hardly ever come across any great women and when they do turn up, you find them in stereotypical roles, as mothers and housewives.” Dean stressed that textbooks need to be rewritten to reflect the changing times.
The executive director of NCJP, Peter Jacob, also wondered that if the study of religion is so important as to be included at every stage in the curriculum, then why does it only focus on Islam. “Why not include other religions as well.”
Sharing her views with The Express Tribune, Dr Nuzhat, the former principal of Government College, Karachi, felt the discussion was particularly saddening if the history of education in Pakistan, and Sindh in particular, was kept in mind.
“Why do we forget that all great schools in Karachi, including Karachi Grammar School and Mama Parsi, were built by non-Muslims? Muslim parents have been dying to get their children admitted into these schools ever since they were built around 100 years ago.” “
What a complete an utter indictement of all Pakistani governments, by not resisting Islam and creating a modern dyamic state (like one of the neighbours) Pakistani education has regressed to the state where the best schools were started or are run by non Muslims. Such is the damage that Islam does to a countries educational system, since 1947 Islamic influence in Government has impoverished Pakistans educational system. There is so much Islamic indoctrination that it must firstly affect how Muslim students think about non-Muslims and secondly that the indoctrination pushes out the useful learning.
What Islamic influence has done to Pakistans educational standards should be brought up every time an Islamic apologist trumpets rubbish about Islamic educational ‘achievement’.
Original story on biases in Pakistani education system
Info on the top schools in Pakistan (run or started by non-Muslims)
Max Mosley, the spankingly unhinged son of failed British Union of Fascist leader Sir Oswald Mosley, has called today for Britain to ‘cut the wires’ to bloggers, even those based outside the UK, who breach the new press censorship and control laws.
Max Mosley got caught and was embarrased by the News of the Screws a few years back by being photographed by the paper, in congress with some allegedly ‘specialist’ working girls.
He made his gobsmackingly arrogant call for total control of Britons viewing offending bloggers, at a session of the Department of Culture, Media and Sport’s select commitee.
The Huffington Post said:
“Max Mosley, the former Formula One Boss turned privacy campaigner following a News of the Word sting, has told MPs he supports “cutting the wires” to internet sites who publish “the worst” pieces in breach of press regulation.
He was speaking alongside press regulation campaign group Hacked Off at Department of Culture, Media And Sport select committee into press regulation, 24 hours after MPs agreed a landmark Royal Charter.
Responding to a discussion about the impracticality of regulating sites based abroad, Mosley suggested that the British public could be banned from seeing such sites, if they routinely break British codes of conduct or publish falsehoods.
“Of course in the worst case you can, figuratively speaking, cut the wire. An order of the English court is enforceable in England. Of course nobody wants to do that,” he said.
He added: “But don’t pretend it’s not practical, because it is.” “
Read the rest of the HuffPo story here: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/03/19/max-mosley_n_2906532.html
Talk about the apple not falling far from the tree, here calling for draconian controls on what people read and view, is the son of the man who, until he was interned, wanted to exchange hard won British freedoms for the type of genocidal fascism that destroyed Germany.
Max Mosley is obviously starting to hear the sound of Daddy’s jackboots in his head.
Huffington Post story on Max Mosley’s DCMS select committee appearance.
Background on Max Mosley and the spanking orgy story
It appears that there has been a human derived technical error which has scrambled some of the text on the titles of some posts and tweets from this blog from English into gibberish. Apologies for this and I’ll try to avoid this in the future.
The problem is not with your computer and is a ‘between keyboard and chair’ issue from this end.
Maybe I should have chosen that game of chess after all*.
When we step in dog poo in the street it is normal to scrape it off if you can with a stick and then carry on with the day. But what of the dangerous human turds that come here, not always with good intentions, who we cannot scrape off? Who our judges forbid us as a nation to scrape off?
Such an unwanted Human Turd is the man the Daily Mirror refer to as Mr X. A man who has close associates with Islamic terrorist groups, including Al-Quaida, who has been repeatedly refused asylum in the UK but who we cannot get rid of because of Labour’s Human Rights Act.
The Daily Mirror said:
“An Iraqi suspected of being involved with al-Qaeda by MI5 has used the Human Rights Act to stay in Britain.
The alleged terror plotter was once regarded as a threat to the public and national security and was the subject of a control order, similar to those imposed on hate preachers Abu Qatada and Abu Hamza.
We have called him Mr X because we are banned from revealing his real name and the location of a mosque in the east of England where he allegedly met with six other extremists.
Patrick Mercer MP, a former army intelligence officer, said: “This shows the Human Rights Act needs to be repealed. We can’t claim to be a sovereign country when foreign powers impose these sorts of laws upon our courts. This man could clearly be dangerous to the British public.”
Mr X, a Muslim from Mosul, was monitored by MI5 for a year from July 2006 because it suspected he was an associate of a known terrorist and hate preacher, identified in court as AE, who had links to militant Islamic groups including Ansar Al Islam, Ansar Al Sunnah and al-Qaeda.”
So here we have someone who is pretty obviously not conducive to the public good but we cannot expel him or intern him because the courts are shackled with legislation that too often appears to favour rapists, murderers, scroungers and traitors. Although I believe that the state should not oppress its people, the state also has a duty to protect its people and allowing people like Mr X to stay goes against that duty of protection.
The Daily Mirror added:
“Mr X, who brought his Iraqi wife into the country in 2010, had failed a number of times to claim asylum since 2002, including once when he claimed he had been framed for murder in Iraq.
An immigration judge ruled in November Iraqi authorities knew of his alleged links to al-Qaeda and could torture him if he was sent back. The judge added: “There is also a risk of execution.”
Mr X’s wife was also granted asylum after the judge said she would also “face persecution as the closest family member of her husband who will be suspected as a Sunni terrorist”. Both were granted anonymity.”
Read the rest of the Daily Mirror story here: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/al-qaeda-terror-suspect-cant-deported-1771616
Risk of execution, Hmm! It’s hard to express the level of ‘f**k that I do not give’ about that one. So a foreign guilty wrong’un gets executed, big deal. I used to be opposed to the death penalty but lately I’ve seen that it does have a place in punishment, if not for all killings but certainly where it is specifically justified for example after the Nuremberg Trials and for those like the murderers Christie and Haigh and genocidal tyrants like Saddam.
Because of the HRA we now have let stay amongst us, someone who would have no hesitation about killing Britons or harming this country, and who it seems is the subject of credible suspicions about terrorist activity overseas. I would love to know why he has been granted anonymity. If it is for national security reasons and this person is connected with an ongoing investigation then fair enough, but if, as is more than likely, that this anonymity was given for HRA ‘right to a family life’ reasons then that is a disgusting misuse of law.
We need to see who our enemies are, especially when they do not wear uniforms. The arguments and ideologies of such people cannot be countered unless they and their views can be argued with and about.
Labour’s Human Rights Act has given a quick and easy path for entry to and permanant residence in the UK for those people who wish to destroy us. The HRA is a slow-fused time bomb under British people, British culture and British sovereignty. Labour brought in some terrible pieces of legislation, but unless the HRA is replaced by a British Bill of Rights, which doesn’t apply to treasonous aliens like Mr X, then Britain will continue to be swamped by foreign chancers and seditionaires. I cannot accept that such an dire outcome of the HRA was the intent of the original, and British, framers of the European Convention of Human Rights after World War II. The Convention has been extended by idiot politicians and venal and ideologically-driven lawyers into areas that it should never have gone.
We need as a nation to reclaim our rights to remove those who would wish to harm us.
We also require knowledge of who exactly is planning to harm us. Do you know who Mr X is because, apart from the security caveat given above, there seems no legitimate reason why the public should not know who he is?
In Britain there is limited disclosure about the identities of convicted child-sex offenders in order to protect children, should there not be disclosure of men like Mr X who follow alien oppressive ideologies which they wish to impose on the UK?